FAQ

Biomass in bale form is often more convenient and easier to handle than loose biomass. If you have space constraints, baled biomass can save space and provide a more efficient storage solution. Additionally, baled biomass can often be transported more easily and with less mess, reducing the overall cost of transportation. That being said, if you have the space and resources to store and handle loose biomass, it may be a more cost-effective option for you. It ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences.

In general, baled biofuels take up less storage space compared to loose material because they are more compact and have a higher bulk density. According to some estimates, the bulk density of baled biofuels can be up to three times higher than the bulk density of loose material.

As an example, for rice husk, the loose bulk density is around 80-100 kg/m³, while the bulk density of baled rice husk can range from 150-250 kg/m³, depending on the bale size and compression. Similarly, the bulk density of loose mustard straw is around 70-90 kg/m³, while the bulk density of baled mustard straw can range from 120-200 kg/m³.

Not all types of biomasses can be easily converted into bale form. Biomass that has long, fibrous stalks like hay, straw, and corn stover are some of the most commonly baled materials. However, other types of biomass such as wood chips or sawdust may not be as easily baled due to their small size and irregular shape.

The ability to bale biomass depends on several factors, including the size and shape of the material, its moisture content, and the equipment and techniques used for baling. In some cases, it may be possible to bale biomass with additional processing, such as grinding or drying, but this can add to the cost and complexity of the process.

Ultimately, the feasibility of baling biomass will depend on the specific type and characteristics of the biomass, as well as the desired end use of the material.

In general, converting raw biomass materials into pellets can be a more efficient and environmentally-friendly option compared to burning them directly.

When raw biomass is burned directly, it tends to release more pollutants and particulate matter into the atmosphere, which can contribute to air pollution and negatively impact human health. Additionally, the combustion efficiency of raw biomass can be lower compared to pellets, as raw biomass may contain a higher moisture content, variable particle size, and lower density.

In contrast, pellets are typically more uniform in size and density, with a lower moisture content. This makes them easier to transport and store, and also leads to a more consistent combustion process. Pellets also tend to have a higher heating value per unit of weight compared to raw biomass, due to the removal of moisture and other impurities during the palletization process.

Overall, converting raw biomass into pellets can be a more sustainable and efficient way to utilize biomass as a fuel source, with potential benefits for both the environment and human health.

Pellets

Notes:
Please note that these ranges are approximate and can vary depending on several factors, including the quality of the feedstock and the testing methods used. It's always best to consult with a qualified testing laboratory for accurate and reliable data on specific feedstocks.

Please note that the moisture content is significantly lower in the pellet form, which means that the heating value is higher due to less energy being used to evaporate moisture. Additionally, the ash content, volatile matter, and fixed carbon remain similar to the raw material form, although there may be slight variations depending on the palletization process used.